College Planning & Management

OCT 2012

College Planning & Management is the information resource for professionals serving the college and university market. Covering facilities, security, technology and business.

Issue link: https://collegeplanning.epubxp.com/i/87376

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 81 of 83

Trends in Green SUSTAINABLE INNOVATIONS ON CAMPUS Expanding Energy Effi ciency Higher education is leading the nation towards a safe and secure energy future. BY LIZ CLARK A S CONGRESS CONSIDERS COMPREHENSIVE tax reform, the National Association of College & Universi- ty Business Offi cers (NACUBO), Second Nature (SN), and the American College & University Presidents' Climate Commitment (ACUPCC) are presenting policy options for changes in tax policy and federal grant programs that would allow colleges and universities to reduce long-term energy expenses, increase operational effi ciencies, and ultimately contribute to efforts to contain costs. The pursuit of substantial energy savings and new effi cient and renewable energy production and sourcing — from wind and solar generation, to natural gas cogeneration, to geothermal and biomass heating and cooling systems — refl ects a strong and increasing commitment to energy effi ciency among presidents and campus business administrators and a mounting consensus that such shifts in campus operations are necessary to maintaining a healthy bottom line. These changes are also spurred in part by the ever-growing environmental consciousness among students, in addition to representing higher education's commitment to equip graduates to be future leaders and problem solvers within a starkly different energy economy than that of decades past. Overcoming the 'Feasibility Gap' However, colleges and universities have found it challenging to identify external sources to help fi nance energy effi ciency or re- newable energy endeavors. Many existing federal energy effi ciency or renewable energy incentives were designed as tax incentives for for-profi t enterprises, or as grant opportunities for state and local governments. Many institutions have tackled the low-hanging fruit of energy effi ciency and conservation on campuses, but deep energy ef- fi ciency — savings of 50 percent or more — is possible and repre- sents a tremendous opportunity for institutions to further reduce operational costs. Assisting institutions in meeting the initial costs of these bigger projects, such as pursuing infrastructure modifi ca- tion and renewable energy alternatives, could allow them to adopt projects previously deemed unaffordable. Where Are the Potential Savings? Demand. Opportunities for higher education to lower demand through deep energy retrofi ts fall into three primary categories: smart labs and high-performance buildings, illumination, and IT/computers. Supply. Many higher education institutions are already pursu- ing a diverse energy strategy centered on enhanced effi ciency and 82 COLLEGE PLANNING & MANAGEMENT / OCTOBER 2012 the transition to renewable and reliable clean energy sources as a way to stabilize long-term energy costs, provide hands-on edu- cational opportunities for students, encourage local and regional economic growth through development of new energy markets, and reduce dependence on nondomestic energy supplies. Distribution. As the nation moves to increase its share of renew- able energy production, lingering challenges include the inter- mittency of renewable power and the lack of an adequate energy storage and distribution system. In many respects, colleges and universities are in the best position to lead the country in develop- ing solutions to thermal energy storage and distribution because of efforts already underway on many campuses to incorporate smart metering and design micro-grids that can transfer energy across campus infrastructure based on demand. Policy Options The ACUPCC Financing Committee and NACUBO's Sustainability Advisory Panel identifi ed fi ve specifi c policy solutions that will enable nonprofi t higher education institutions to support their environ- mental aims and enhance their fi nancial stability. These incentives ultimately could help institutions invest in projects that, through time, would yield long-term savings. The solutions identifi ed are: 1. Allow colleges and universities to use tax-exempt and revenue bond fi nancing to pre-pay power purchase agreements. 2. Develop new energy effi ciency and renewable energy loan options open to institutions of higher education, including establishing a federal loan guarantee program and developing a federal revolving loan fund for energy-effi ciency initiatives. 3. Establish, alter, and fund federal grant programs, including Sec- tion 471 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 20076. 4. Allow long-term charitable deductions and tax credits for bio- mass and bio-methane contributions. 5. Extend eligibility of Clean and Renewable Energy Bonds (CREBs). At a time when economic resurgence and job creation remain national priorities, incentivizing investment in infrastructure that can lead to economic productivity and markedly lower energy costs is not only logical, but necessary. Federal government sup- port for these policies can open up new possibilities by mitigating or eliminating barriers to furthering energy-effi ciency goals at colleges and universities across the country. CPM Liz Clark is director, Congressional Relations for NACUBO. She can be reached at lclark@nacubo.org. WWW.PLANNING4EDUCATION.COM

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of College Planning & Management - OCT 2012